The Chinese authorities have returned Ai Weiwei’s passport, some four years after it was confiscated and he was denied all foreign travel. This news is hugely welcome, whatever one thinks of Ai’s art. (The first response to our Tweet the news this morning: ‘Stop praising this fool please. Seriously’). No individual should be denied the freedom of movement on the basis of their political beliefs, and no public figure should ever face the farcical, state-driven harassment against which Ai has continued to work and speak.
It now looks like a coup for the Royal Academy to be hosting a vast retrospective this autumn – presumably one of the first displays of his work that the artist will now be able to visit outside China. I wonder whether the RA has itself pitched in with some soft diplomatic encouragement. The institution has, after all, partnered with art schools in Beijing and Hong Kong in the last 12 months, establishing an artist-in-residence exchange programme, and it has run curatorial exchange programmes with museums in Hong Kong.
What will be interesting, come September, is whether Ai’s new freedom to travel affects how his work is presented – and whether future installations will take a different tone from his recent output. For in a sense, Ai has become a digital artist over the last four years, communicating with curators, gallerists and journalists via Skype, and speaking to a wider public through Twitter and Instagram. ‘The Internet lets me travel,’ he told Sarah Thornton via Skype in her 33 Artists in 3 Acts (though, as she noted, ‘his image is pixelated and his voice is occasionally garbled’). Will the RA exhibition, and other shows to come, feel more intimate, more direct and less ‘pixelated’, for not being prepared down fibre-optic cables?
![Masterpiece [Re]discovery 2022. Photo: Ben Fisher Photography, courtesy of Masterpiece London](http://zephr.apollo-magazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/MPL2022_4263.jpg)
Ai Weiwei’s returned passport is a coup for the RA
Photo: Ai Wei Wei via Instagram
Share
The Chinese authorities have returned Ai Weiwei’s passport, some four years after it was confiscated and he was denied all foreign travel. This news is hugely welcome, whatever one thinks of Ai’s art. (The first response to our Tweet the news this morning: ‘Stop praising this fool please. Seriously’). No individual should be denied the freedom of movement on the basis of their political beliefs, and no public figure should ever face the farcical, state-driven harassment against which Ai has continued to work and speak.
It now looks like a coup for the Royal Academy to be hosting a vast retrospective this autumn – presumably one of the first displays of his work that the artist will now be able to visit outside China. I wonder whether the RA has itself pitched in with some soft diplomatic encouragement. The institution has, after all, partnered with art schools in Beijing and Hong Kong in the last 12 months, establishing an artist-in-residence exchange programme, and it has run curatorial exchange programmes with museums in Hong Kong.
What will be interesting, come September, is whether Ai’s new freedom to travel affects how his work is presented – and whether future installations will take a different tone from his recent output. For in a sense, Ai has become a digital artist over the last four years, communicating with curators, gallerists and journalists via Skype, and speaking to a wider public through Twitter and Instagram. ‘The Internet lets me travel,’ he told Sarah Thornton via Skype in her 33 Artists in 3 Acts (though, as she noted, ‘his image is pixelated and his voice is occasionally garbled’). Will the RA exhibition, and other shows to come, feel more intimate, more direct and less ‘pixelated’, for not being prepared down fibre-optic cables?
Unlimited access from just $16 every 3 months
Subscribe to get unlimited and exclusive access to the top art stories, interviews and exhibition reviews.
Share
Recommended for you
Introducing this year’s Prix Pictet contenders
The theme for the latest edition of the prestigious prize is ‘Disorder’
What to see at the Venice Biennale
Some of the best of the national pavilions, collateral events and satellite shows across the city
Is it time to scrap the BP Portrait Award?
The prize has come up for criticism this year, as it always does. But there’s still merit in it